|
« Art
is all Over »
CHRISTOPHE DOMINO
"Iain Baxter. Art is all Over", ArtPress, n°234,
April 1998, p. 50-53.
Noted for achieving "a degree of success rarely matched
nationally and internationally among the Canadian artists in the late
1960s and early 1970s, "1 and chosen alongside the
Betty Goldwyns and Michael Snows of this world as one of the figures
worthy of in-depth documentation at the Art Gallery of Ontario (Toronto),
lain Baxter is the author of an artistic enterprise (quite literally,
since in 1969 he founded the N.E. Thing Co. with his wife Ingrid as
codirector) that has rarely caught the Euro-pean eye. And yet, from
its beginnings in 1966, Baxter's seminal work has been influen-tial
well beyond his geographical base.
The Baxters' pioneering work with N.E. Thing Co. (NETCO) was right
on the button, and there was a great lightness about the way it treated
such issues as the nature of artistic gesture and engagement and their
rootedness in social, economic reality and communications. Such themes
are central to much new work being done in France today. In Canada,
they only became clearly political some time after NETCO, within the
inappropriately named "scene" in Vancouver, a town where
Baxter spent ten years teaching starting in 1966. Since 1978 he has
worked under his own name, but today he is stilt extending the ideas
expressed by NETCO and is as sharp as ever after three decades of
activity. His work is characterized by a singularity of tone which
has something to do with humor, in the fullest sense of the word,
a very free use of different mediums, and a truly generous inventiveness
linked to the artist's everyday life. This is why it is impossible
to reduce Baxter's work to any given category or historic moment,
even one as vague as conceptual art.2 He has defined himself
as an "ideas factory." Above all, he has a rare ability
to carry through his prolific ideas, both as projects and as finished
pieces. His guiding references are the vitalistic spirit of pragmatism
and John Dewey's idea of art as experience.3 With an unfailingly
light touch, his oeuvre covers earth works, conceptualism, communication
technology (fax and telex pieces, photocopying, printing, publishing),
the codes of language and communication, the properties of the medium
of photography (Wall and others are indebted to him for the light
box),4 painting, installations, actions, activism, charts
and inventories (many of them photographic), the production of objects
(badges, for example), plus a number of more marginal activities such
as teaching, which has long been a part of Baxter's life as an artist,
catering (Eye Scream, Vancouver 1977-78) and consultancy
(he was adviser to the board of the giant Labatt breweries). In short,
almost anything.
As said above, this enterprising spirit was summed up and coordinated
in the group work done by NETCO, a company operating in the general
economic sphere with the aim of generating revenue by legitimate,
imaginative and profitable business activities. A statement from 1971
lists the following objectives:
i To produce sensitivity information:
ii To provide a consultation and evaluation service with respect to
things:
iii To produce, manufacture, import, export, buy, sell, and otherwise
deal in things of all kinds.
In practical terms, NETCO ran a restaurant and a photo lab that made
cibachromes, handled the artist's personal exhibitions and participation
in international shows of conceptual art, dealt with galleries, including
Sonnabend in New York, sponsored a junior ice hockey team and synchronized
swimming shows, and produced and promoted actions and information
("things" par excellence). Pastiching conceptualist
objectification and Minimalist rigor, parodying the customs of the
society of communication, NETCO undertook to redefine the objectives
and methods of artistic practice, considering the subjective apprehension
of any kind of information as the nodal point of art, irrespective
of quality. The centrality of language in a number of propositions
of the '70s and '80s, such as the People/Language project
(1977), recalls the initial link with conceptual art. But Baxter adds
a further element of distance via a mockingly literal or displaced
use of names. Mixing the theories of McLuhan and an activisim inspired
by Dada, Fluxus and the collectivist spirit of the late '60s, NETCO
responded to the society of information by offering its own system
for describing cultural activities. This was the Sensitivity Information
system. Its categories, which can be mixed and matched, were VSI (Visual
Sensitivity Information: aka visual art), SSI (Sound Sensitivity Information:
music, poetry readings, singing, oratory, etc.), MSI (Moving Sensitivity
Information: movies, dance, mountain climbing, track and field), ESI
(Experiential Sensitivity Information: theater, performance, etc.).
NETCO's eleven departments included those for Aesthetically Claimed
Things (ACT) and Aesthetically Rejected Things (ART), which produced,
distributed and, above all, labeled soundings and recordings of things
of the world, sorting Sl-type phenomena from non-SI ones. This quasi-theoretical
foundation allowed Baxter to make an ironic dig at attempts to construct
a formal account of culture while producing a discourse on the real
that itself constitutes a paradoxical archive which puts its seal
on found situations, landscapes and even work by other artists. A
plate of 16 transparencies from this series appeared on the cover
of Art in America in 1969.
Their incessant productivity took the Baxters' taste for photographic
record well beyond series such as these. In its original exhibition
form, their Portfolio of Piles (1969), which has become relatively
well known since featuring in a book by Lucy Lippard, referred to
a real topography, by locating on a map these formless ready-mades
now paradoxically formalized by the principle of the series. In fact,
all their work from the '60s to the present is informed by their sense
of landscape. This lies behind such joyous projects of the "Sensitivity
information research on [...] the general phenomenon of winter"
as the very organic snow sculpture entitled P-line Straight
(1968), or the projects for placards which have been installed on
several different occasions since 1968, the 1/4 Miles Landscape,
which frames 440 yards of attention to the landscape along a highway,
or the appropriation and reversal of landscape logic effected by the
sign You are in the middle of an N.E. Thing landscape. Or
again, in One Canada Video, 100 hours of landscape seen through
the windscreen of car.
Today, Baxter is as insistent as ever in his literal use of words
and things—of everyday objects. The spirit of N.E. Thing is
alive and kicking in his continuous photographic sampling. Judging
by his last show, it would seem that, alongside his very pictorial
use of painting (which tends more towards decor), consumer products
are still one of the key mediums for his statements about the state
of the planet and its wildlife, statements that hover between portentousness
and offhand-edness. Formal economy, even indigence, is still a frequent
characteristic, suggesting both the kind of non-artistic quality that
Lucy Lippard detected in the works of NETCO and a nonchalant radicalism
that seeks no critical justifications or commitments outside the simple
fact of action. Thus, in Baxter's literal and joyous system we find
Techno Compost, a graveyard of electronic equipment (old
computers, radios, domestic appliances) laid out in the avenues of
a shopping mall in the name of art. A somewhat nostalgic, subtly deathly
experience of sculpture which, as Baxter tells us, is all about watching
a sculpture come together piece by piece, in the pathetic, amused
expectation of seeing all these things begin to decay.
Translation, C. Penwarden
1 Derek Knight, in N.E. Thing Co., the Ubiquitous Concept
(Oakville Galleries, 1995).
2 NETCO gets only a passing mention in the catalogue of L'Art
conceptuel, une perspective (Paris: ARC, 1989) but gets an alphabetical
entry in Reconsidering the Object of Art (Los Angeles, 1995).
3 See Dewey's influential Art as Experience (1933).
4 Derek Knight gives a clear account of the various readings
of the exchanges and influences on the Canadian art scene of the '60s.
|