Biobibliography
N.E. Thing Co.
Works and Projects
  Techno Compost
One Canada Video
Instant America
Département ACT et ART
Arctic Circle
projectTelex
Art in America
Quarter Mile N.E. Thing Co. Landscape
Building Structure
Portfolio of Piles
Bagged Place
Projets de livre
Reflection Lethbridge
Almanach Process Series
Ever Ready
Essays and Articles
Glossary
Credits
Français

Iain Baxter&
project: Département ACT et ART
The ACT and ART Department, 1967–1970
(Aesthetically Claimed Things and Aesthetically Rejected Things)
N.E. Thing Co. developed the ACT and ART department in 1967, essentially to produce photographic documentation of situations, things and works—and to pass judgment on them, declaring whether they satisfied the “sensitivity information criteria” defined by the company. Photographs produced for the ACT and ART department were systematically reproduced on “spec sheets,” which were then marked with an official seal either certifying or disapproving of the quality of their content. Marcel Duchamp’s ready-mades, Robert Smithson’s non-sites, Andy Warhol’s Elvis prints, Mike Heizer’s Circumflex, an Edward Weston landscape and even the cover of the January 1969 issue of Artforum were all ironically assessed in this way according to the preferences of the company directors. This enterprise aimed to, among other things, raise awareness of the processes of aesthetic judgment that all observers apply in their relationships to works of art. The image production was often inspired by evocative shapes perceived by the artists in their immediate surroundings or encountered in their travels. Other times, their image production consisted most often in rephotographing works and landscapes published in catalogues and art magazines (a method that would be systematically taken up again in the late 1970s by Sherry Levine and Richard Prince). Many of these images thus speak judiciously to a relationship to the world and an experience of art that is conditioned by reproductions in magazines and books. It bears repeating that these distribution media represented, at the time, a means for artists living and working outside the world’s great artistic capitals to have access to contemporary practices.